Select Page

The Wagners - A Serious Injury Law Firm blog shares Personal Injury stories and opinions relevant to Halifax, Nova Scotia residents. Let us know what you think.

Don Henderson takes legal action against Dennis Wideman and the Calgary Flames

by | Friday, May 5, 2017

On January 27th, 2016, the Calgary Flames played the Nashville Predators in the last game before the all star break. During the game, Dennis Wideman was hit by the Predators’ Mikka Salomaki. Shortly after being hit, as Wideman returned to the bench, he cross-checked Don Henderson, an NHL linesman, from behind. Henderson was knocked against the boards and to the ice. Unfortunately, over a year later, Henderson has not returned to working as an NHL linesman[1].

Wideman was initially suspended for a 20 game period. He claimed to have been disoriented from the previous hit he suffered at the hands of Salomaki and he asserted that the contact with Henderson was unintentional[2]. After numerous appeals, an independent arbitration and a lawsuit to vacate the arbitrator’s decision, Wideman returned to the ice just before the 2016 season came to an end.

On April 20th, 2017, Henderson filed a statement of claim against Dennis Wideman and the Calgary Flames. In the claim, Henderson alleges that he was “completely defenceless” when Wideman “violently struck” him from behind[3]. Henderson alleges that he suffered a host of injuries in relation to the incident, including an injury to his neck, which required surgery, a concussion, a back injury, headaches, numbness and tingling in the right arm and hand, among other problems[4].

Henderson alleges the incident was an “attack” in which he was “violently” hit from behind[5]. One question in particular is worth further exploration. With regard to the physical contact that took place between Henderson and Wideman, is battery a cause of action that is available to Henderson? What sports related defence may Wideman employ in response?

Yes, battery is a cause of action that is available to Henderson. Battery is the intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact[6]. One must intend to make physical contact, but not necessarily to cause harm. The contact must be physical and may be made with the plaintiff’s body, or with items which are closely connected to the body. The contact need not cause a physical injury as conduct offensive to the reasonable plaintiff may be sufficient. The courts tend to take into account societal standards of acceptable conduct.

Henderson could allege that Wideman intentionally inflicted harmful bodily contact when he struck him from behind, causing Henderson to sustain physical and psychological injuries.

In his defence, Wideman might argue that Henderson consented to his actions. Essentially, consent is a willingness that the act occurs. In the past, Canadian courts have found that a person who enters a sporting activity is taken to consent to the ordinary risks and contacts involved[7]. However, this does not apply to contact that is outside the bounds of fair play or malicious and out of the ordinary[8].

Wideman’s defence could counter an allegation of battery by arguing the hit was within the ordinary risks associated with playing hockey in the NHL. However, Henderson’s personal injury lawyer will likely respond by arguing the hit from behind, on a referee, was outside the bounds of fair play, malicious in nature, and very much out of the ordinary.

It should be quite intriguing to see how things will unfold going forward. However, one thing is certain, the incident has led to a discussion in the NHL, wider society, and the legal community, how these types of incidents should be dealt with moving forward.

If you or a loved one have been seriously injured in a sports related incident, and you are unsure what you can claim for, the legal team at Wagners can help you. You can reach us at 902-425-7330 or 1-800-465-8794.

[1]Allan Maki, NHL linesman Don Henderson seeks damages for hit by Dennis Wideman, The Globe and Mail, (21 April 2017), online:

[2]Colleen Schmidt, Linesman launches legal action against Flames’ player for on ice hit, Globe and Mail (20 April 2017), online: <>.

[3]Ibid.[4]Ibid.[5]Ibid.[6]Saether v Irvine, 2011 BCSC 1497 (BC SC) at paras. 49 and 51-53.

[7]Agar v Canning (1965), 54 WWR 302 (Man QB); affirmed (1966), 55 WWR 384 (Man CA); Martin v Daigle (1969), 6 DLR (3d) 634 (NB CA).

[8]Colby v Schmidt (1986), [1986] 6 WWR 65 (BC SC).

Do You Have a Claim?

I have read and understand the disclaimer.

call for a free consultation


Sam M
Sam M
16:11 19 Jan 18
Dyana was so kind to help me and respond to my query within 24h even though they do not pursue the specific class action I was looking for. She sent me few links by email. Thank you Dyana.
linda frausell
linda frausell
01:21 16 May 17
I have dealt with Wagner and Associates over the years and have received great advice,support and results . Their team is very respectful and show they care. You can trust them to take care of you and they always have your best interest in hand. I would definetly recommend them .
frank slaunwhite
frank slaunwhite
16:29 03 May 17
Ray Wagner and his legal team have been representing my niece and I for many years. They have been honest and quick to respond to all our needs in a professional manner. I highly recommend Wagners Law Firm and appreciate their caring approach. Thanks
Missy Day
Missy Day
12:03 06 Oct 16
I can't speak highly enough about the lawyers at Wagners who represented me for injuries from not one but two motor vehicle accidents. They were very professional and approachable. I was kept informed of all steps in the process and all of my inquiries were responded to and dealt with very quickly. The lawyers are knowledgeable and showed great empathy for what I was going through. I would recommend this firm to anyone!
Nicholas Gordon
Nicholas Gordon
11:30 06 Oct 16
I contacted Wagners about a motor vehicle accident. I was able to speak with someone right away. The staff were very pleasant and helpful. I received a response about pursuing a case the next day. I would highly recommend this firm.
See All Reviews