The Wagners - A Serious Injury Law Firm blog shares Personal Injury stories and opinions relevant to Halifax, Nova Scotia residents. Let us know what you think.

Ruling Assigns Tissue to Facility, Not Individual

by | Thursday, June 12, 2014

In a case with implications on how medicine is practiced in Nova Scotia and across the nation, an Ontario court determined on June 4 that human tissue is the property of the medical facility that obtained it and not the patient from which it came. The case could be contested in other jurisdictions or by the family, but if the ruling holds, it could have widespread ramifications for Canadians over how genetic information, tissue samples and even blood are handled.

The controversy in the case related to a woman who was hospitalized in 2009 in Toronto and was diagnosed with cancer. She passed away in 2011. Her estate filed a medical malpractice lawsuit, claiming that doctors were negligent when they found her cancer-free in 2009. Two of the defending doctors wanted to submit the liver biopsy from that time for further analysis as they thought the biopsy might show that the woman had suffered from a heredity cancer that worsens very quickly and is often undetectable during initial testing. However, they did not have legal access to the sample.

The court determined that the tissue sample belonged to the hospital because it had obtained the sample and performed diagnostic tests. The court also designated the tissue as personal property. A policymaker with the University of Alberta explained that the decision seems merely procedural on the surface, but it could have significant implications.

The Canadian ruling is generally in line with court rulings in the United States. In the highly publicized case of one woman, her tissue was used for scientific research and development without her knowledge or permission. Possession of tissue, blood or DNA samples is a questionable area. A personal injury lawyer might be able to contest the outcome of a court ruling for possession of tissue.

Source: National Post, “Human tissue removed for medical tests is ‘personal property’ of institution, not person it came from: ruling“, Richard Warnica , June 05, 2014

Sam M
Sam M
16:11 19 Jan 18
Dyana was so kind to help me and respond to my query within 24h even though they do not pursue the specific class action I was looking for. She sent me few links by email. Thank you Dyana.
linda frausell
linda frausell
01:21 16 May 17
I have dealt with Wagner and Associates over the years and have received great advice,support and results . Their team is very respectful and show they care. You can trust them to take care of you and they always have your best interest in hand. I would definetly recommend them .
frank slaunwhite
frank slaunwhite
16:29 03 May 17
Ray Wagner and his legal team have been representing my niece and I for many years. They have been honest and quick to respond to all our needs in a professional manner. I highly recommend Wagners Law Firm and appreciate their caring approach.Thanks
Missy Day
Missy Day
12:03 06 Oct 16
I can't speak highly enough about the lawyers at Wagners who represented me for injuries from not one but two motor vehicle accidents. They were very professional and approachable. I was kept informed of all steps in the process and all of my inquiries were responded to and dealt with very quickly. The lawyers are knowledgeable and showed great empathy for what I was going through. I would recommend this firm to anyone!
Nicholas Gordon
Nicholas Gordon
11:30 06 Oct 16
I contacted Wagners about a motor vehicle accident.I was able to speak with someone right away. The staff were very pleasant and helpful.I received a response about pursuing a case the next day.I would highly recommend this firm.
See All Reviews
LIVE CHAT