The Wagners - A Serious Injury Law Firm blog shares Personal Injury stories and opinions relevant to Halifax, Nova Scotia residents. Let us know what you think.

When is a radiographic error simply an error and when is it malpractice?

by | Monday, October 16, 2017

Approximately 4% of radiographic interpretations rendered by radiologists in their daily practice contain errors.[1] Most of these errors however are either minor, or if serious, are found and corrected with sufficient timeliness that any potential harm to the patient is avoided. Nonetheless, radiological errors do harm patients, as treating physicians who’ve ordered the diagnostic testing rely on the radiological interpretation for diagnosis and treatment planning.

A plaintiff is required to prove four things in order for a radiologist (or any physician) to be found liable in medical negligence:

  1. a physician-patient relationship;
  2. the radiologist must have breached the standard of care (i.e. committed a negligent act);
  3. the negligent act must have caused injury to the plaintiff-patient; and
  4. the patient must have sustained an injury/damages as a result.

In malpractice cases, issues two and three are the most contentious and difficult to prove.

Nearly 75% of all medical malpractice lawsuits pursued against diagnostic radiologists claim negligence related to errors in diagnosis. Though certain radiographic errors result from a radiologists’ negligent conduct, others are simply a reality of the unavoidable “human factor” at play in the review of films and diagnostic images. Errors in perception by radiologists’ review of images occur in the absence of negligence, and some abnormalities will inevitably be missed.

Negligence occurs when the degree of error exceeds the acceptable norm; not merely when there is an error. Perfection is not the standard of care of any physician, including radiologists.

The focus of attention in medical malpractice cases involving radiological negligence should thus be on issues such as proof of competence, habits of practice (such as interpretation of images in a rushed and hurried manner), proper reporting, requests for more imaging if images are insufficiently clear to provide a diagnosis or exclude one, and the use of proper techniques.

In cases alleging missed radiologic diagnosis, the question is not only whether the radiologist missed an abnormal finding. Rather, the issue is whether missing the abnormal finding is acceptable within the usual and customary standards of the radiology community. This determination, by judge and jury alike, is far from simple, and will be informed by testimony from various medical witnesses from both the plaintiff and defendant.

While the distinction between human error and negligence in radiologic medical malpractice cases remains elusive, the miss of an abnormal finding that can be seen retrospectively on radiographs – particularly where that miss has grave consequences on the plaintiff-patient – makes a persuasive case for a jury to find a radiologist, who is supposed to be highly-trained and is well-paid to detect all abnormalities, negligent.

[1] Borgstede JP et al “RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates” J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1, 212-217

Sam M
Sam M
16:11 19 Jan 18
Dyana was so kind to help me and respond to my query within 24h even though they do not pursue the specific class action I was looking for. She sent me few links by email. Thank you Dyana.
linda frausell
linda frausell
01:21 16 May 17
I have dealt with Wagner and Associates over the years and have received great advice,support and results . Their team is very respectful and show they care. You can trust them to take care of you and they always have your best interest in hand. I would definetly recommend them .
frank slaunwhite
frank slaunwhite
16:29 03 May 17
Ray Wagner and his legal team have been representing my niece and I for many years. They have been honest and quick to respond to all our needs in a professional manner. I highly recommend Wagners Law Firm and appreciate their caring approach. Thanks
Missy Day
Missy Day
12:03 06 Oct 16
I can't speak highly enough about the lawyers at Wagners who represented me for injuries from not one but two motor vehicle accidents. They were very professional and approachable. I was kept informed of all steps in the process and all of my inquiries were responded to and dealt with very quickly. The lawyers are knowledgeable and showed great empathy for what I was going through. I would recommend this firm to anyone!
Nicholas Gordon
Nicholas Gordon
11:30 06 Oct 16
I contacted Wagners about a motor vehicle accident. I was able to speak with someone right away. The staff were very pleasant and helpful. I received a response about pursuing a case the next day. I would highly recommend this firm.
See All Reviews